In A Violent Nature (2024)

 

**This post contains spoilers**

The Story- In Ontario, Canada, Troy (Liam Leone) takes a locket necklace hanging above Johnny’s (Ry Barrett) grave at an old abandoned fire tower. The necklace, a gift from Johnny’s father, belonged to his deceased mother. Removing the necklace, the only item capable of keeping Johnny’s soul at rest, resurrects Johnny.

Troy, his girlfriend, Kris (Andrea Pavlovic), their friends, Ehren (Sam Roulston), Aurora (Charlotte Creaghan), Brodie (Lea Rose Sebastianis), Evan (Alexander Oliver), and Colt (Cameron Love) are all enjoying a peaceful getaway at a cabin in the wilderness. Armed with dragging hooks, an axe, and wearing an old firefighter mask, Johnny attacks the group, determined to retrieve his mother’s locket, by any means necessary. 

My Thoughts- Johnny checks off just about every box that you could possibly think of for a slasher villain. He’s a vicious hulking brute with superhuman strength. Bullets? They only slow him down. 

You can take one look at Johnny before he starts his killing spree, and you’ll quickly notice he’s seemingly invincible. Johnny’s nightmarish appearance really pulls everything together, with the dirty clothes, the bullet holes on his body, and his rough hands. Johnny is a big guy, but he’s also smart. He’s a tactical killer, setting traps, or patiently waiting for the right moment to strike. 

But the monster has a tragic backstory. Johnny, living with a mental disorder, was targeted as a kid, collateral damage because his father, a shop owner, raised his prices. Bullets, traps, Johnny being outnumbered. None of it matters, because a mother’s love is the only thing that’s capable of stopping Johnny and bringing him any kind of peace. 

No jump scares, or surprises before the kills throughout the movie, because In A Violent Nature mostly plays out from Johnny’s perspective. You know he’s coming, and more often than not, you know what’s going to happen, when Johnny corners his victims. It’s a refreshing approach to largely show the movie from Johnny’s POV. 

Jump scares in horror movies are fine, when they’re limited, but In A Violent Nature flips things around. Early on you can see just how dangerous Johnny truly is, a killer, who won’t stop until he finds his locket. The protagonists are unaware of Johnny lurking in the background or in the shadows, and when he finally pops up, it’s too late. That’s still terrifying, knowing the killing machine is marching towards his targets, who have slim chances of survival, and you’re seeing everything unfold from his perspective.

I have mixed feelings for how the ending played out. Kris is the sole survivor and the final girl, but the long conversation with The Woman (Lauren-Marie Taylor)? Why did they do this towards the end? 

It’s kind of puzzling, because the sequence with Kris getting lost in the woods at night and running around in circles builds up anticipation for something big. Maybe Johnny surprises her? Kris struggles to escape Johnny? Or maybe Kris finds a way to defeat Johnny? But In A Violent Nature ends with a long conversation during a car ride, The Woman patching up Kris’ bloody and injured leg, and a shot of the missing locket that Kris hung on the gas can? That’s it?

I’m not saying it’s a terrible ending. The Woman’s story about her brother surviving a bear attack after Kris told her she was attacked by an “animal” is loaded with similarities to the horrors Kris endured, including The Woman’s reasons for why animals kill. I just don’t understand the reasoning behind deciding to cool things down during the home stretch, after teasing a final showdown between Kris and Johnny. 

There’s also a tease for a sequel. Kris placed the locket on the gas can and ran away, but in the final shot of the movie, you’ll notice the locket is gone. It’s not confirmed if Johnny retrieved the locket, or if someone else took it.

Why did they show Johnny’s face? It’s a weird decision after a noticeable effort to hide Johnny’s face in every scene until the reveal happens. Showing what Johnny actually looks like should’ve been a big moment. Instead, he just takes his mask off, he plays with a toy car, and then Johnny nonchalantly puts his mask back on like nothing happened.

Showing the vast majority of the movie from the killer’s perspective helps In A Violent Nature stand out from other slashers, but that doesn’t cancel out the fact that the movie still features some of the usual slasher tropes. And the characters are pretty thin without any real depth. 

Still, In A Violent Nature is a solid slasher, featuring bloody and gruesome gore and a high kill count. Aurora’s death is BY FAR one of the nastiest and more extreme kills I’ve ever seen in any kind of horror film. A few moments of humor in the early stages. Chuck (Timothy Paul McCarthy), his “#1 mother******” trucker cap, followed by Johnny mistaking his mother’s locket for Chuck’s locket. And the goofing around between the group at the campfire and teasing Ehren. 

Writer/director Chris Nash cleverly ties together a lot of plot points and events from Johnny’s past. The toy car is a big one. Remember, Johnny’s toy car injured a worker, sparking the incident that caused so much trouble. You’ll notice a red electric toy car outside of Chuck’s house, and Johnny plays with a red toy car on the keychain in the woods. The firefighter mask Johnny wears? It’s the same kind of mask that was used in a prank to scare him. Good irony for Johnny using something that was meant to hurt him, and turning it into his own symbol of fear and intimidation. 

There’s also no denying In Violent Nature is a beautifully shot film with an artsy feel to it. I can maybe understand someone getting bored watching Johnny constantly stomping through the woods, but there’s a strange irony for so many horrible murders happening in the quiet and peaceful wilderness. I’m also glad there’s no theme music throughout the movie, because In A Violent Nature still manages to be a tense film. The scene, where Kris is running from Johnny at night is one good example for the eerie silence and the sounds of nature working.

In A Violent Nature has an old school vibe to it. A slasher set in the woods, and college kids are being stalked by a masked killer?  I’m also a sucker for campfire tales (Ehren telling the story of The White Plains Slaughter) about the horrible past in a small community or a small town. It’s all there, but In A Violent Nature is still a modern film. Selfies, and a conversation about cancel culture, when the group is tiptoeing around saying the R-word to describe Johnny. 

After the first trailer, I knew what to expect from In A Violent Nature, so the slasher cliches didn’t bother me too much. With or without the decision to show a good eighty to ninety percent of the movie from Johnny’s POV, the cliches are still right in front of you. I guess my only complaint is Lauren-Marie Taylor’s conversation with Kris, and the iffy ending. I don’t have a problem with Taylor’s unique pep talk, but the placement of it just didn’t work for me. 

I’m looking forward to the planned sequel, because I’m always ready for a new horror series, especially a slasher series. There’s still a lot of material to work with, including revisiting Johnny’s past. The Ranger (Reece Presley) told Kris and Colt The White Plains Slaughter story was “mostly true,” so it’s possible there’s more than one version of what actually happened. 

In A Violent Nature had a good amount of buzz for a low budget unrated slasher. Hopefully they’ll be able to keep the momentum going with the sequel. Is there a spot for Johnny as a popular slasher villain? Time will tell.

Rating- 7/10