Character Spotlight- Dr. Dan Challis- Halloween III: Season Of The Witch

 **This post contains spoilers**

Ellie Grimbridge (Stacey Nelkin) needs help to solve the mystery behind her father, Harry’s (Al Berry) death. The police? A private investigator? Maybe a detective? What about a divorced doctor with two kids? After a chance encounter with Harry at the hospital, and the discovery of one of the many infamous Silver Shamrock Halloween masks, Dr. Dan Challis (Tom Atkins) takes an impromptu trip to the quiet town of Santa Mira with Ellie.

Dan’s helping Ellie find closure and answers for her father’s murder. He’s trying to stop Conal Cochran (Dan O’Herlihy), the evil mastermind behind Silver Shamrock, before the big giveaway happens, hopefully saving the lives of unsuspecting children. Surely he’s a good guy, right? 

Dan’s story is a bit unusual. He’s a doctor, so you could say he likes helping people. But Dan has a noticeably icy and strained relationship with his ex-wife, Linda (Nancy Kyes). Another big problem? Dan has a bad habit of breaking promises to spend time with his son, Willie (Joshua Miller) and his daughter, Bella (Michelle Walker). Towards the end, Dan actually had a good excuse. He was being held captive by Cochran and his army of androids, and Dan was trying to stop a nationwide sacrifice. Still, that’s the only legitimate excuse for Dan’s unfortunate streak of carelessness. 

Dan is a ladies’ man! The coroner’s assistant, Teddy (Wendy Wessberg), playful flirting with Nurse Agnes (Maidie Norman), and his fling with Ellie in Santa Mira. Dan, in spite of all his faults, has a laid-back personality and a knack for smooth talking at the right moments. And let’s not forget, he is a doctor. Dan is a seemingly irresistible Casanova, but on the other side of that, it’s easy to take a guess that infidelity might’ve played a role in his divorce from Linda.

Is Dan a screwup? Sure, he’s a bit selfish. He lied about going to Santa Mira with Ellie, but Dan Challis is not a mean-spirited person. You always get the feeling his heart is in the right place, but he just can’t get out of his own way. One self-induced mistake after another, because Dan would’ve been able to take his kids trick-or-treating, if he never went to Santa Mira with Ellie. 

Tom Atkins brings a likable and cool everyman charm to Dan. It’s almost impossible to not laugh at this guy. His ex-wife hates him. He’s not spending time with his kids, so what does Dan decide to do? He runs off to a town that he’s never been to, with a woman, who’s at least half his age and a six pack of beer. 

Dan is not your typical hero, but he’s a scrappy and resourceful fighter, who won’t quit. He outsmarted Cochran, defeated his androids, and Dan is responsible for destroying the factory. And Dan managed to survive an attack from the android version of Ellie, Cochran’s final curveball. 

It’s ironic how Dan’s irresponsible decisions weirdly leads to him possibly saving everyone from Cochran’s evil scheme. His actions angered Linda, he neglected his kids, and you could say he’s responsible for Teddy’s death. But Dan still puts his life on the line to fight Cochran. 

A man who benefited from a series of lucky breaks, Dan Challis also endures a number of setbacks. Android Ellie, and Dan pleading with the networks to remove (“STOP IIIIIIIITTTT!!”) the Silver Shamrock jingle commercial. Did Dan succeed in stopping the final commercial? We’ll never know for sure, but it doesn’t hurt to believe in the possibility that Dan was able to pull off one last Hail Mary. 

Character Spotlight- Conal Cochran- Halloween III: Season Of The Witch

 

**This post contains spoilers**

Conal Cochran (Dan O’ Herlihy), a savvy Irish gentleman, the proprietor of Silver Shamrock Novelties, and the savior of a small town named Santa Mira. A toymaker, the master of gags, practical jokes, and Halloween masks, Cochran is seemingly a charming businessman with a big heart. Rafferty (Michael Currie), the hotel manager and one of Cochran’s loyal subordinates, adores Cochran, praising him as a benevolent icon. The big secret? Cochran is an evil mastermind, who’s planning to use Silver Shamrock masks to carry out brutal ritual human sacrifices targeting children.

No underboss. Nobody to claim the title of the right hand man or woman. Conal Cochran is the unquestioned decision maker. He’s the final boss, so it’s easy to understand why Cochran uses androids as his enforcers, an efficient hit squad obeying his orders. 

Cochran, a sharp and obsessive control freak, demands unwavering loyalty. The wiretapped phones, the surveillance cameras, the curfews, and the androids. He’s not going to take any chances trusting flawed humans. No debates, no arguments, and no committees. Need an example? Starker (Jonathan Terry), a “local boy,” was bitter about Cochran denying him a job at the factory. Starker loudly vented about his plans to burn down the factory and eliminate Cochran. Big mistake, because Cochran obviously ordered two of his androids to kill Strarker moments after his rant. 

Cochran mastered the art of being a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Buddy Kupfer (Ralph Strait), his wife, Betty (Jadeen Barbor), and his son, Little Buddy (Brad Schacter) believed they were about to watch a harmless commercial. Buddy was ready to take notes, and Little Buddy was excited to be the first kid to participate in the big giveaway! The bad news here is, it was all a setup, or a “demonstration” for Cochran to test his deadly Halloween masks. Little Buddy was a guinea pig, suffering a brutal death via his new pumpkin Halloween mask.

That’s what makes Cochran so dangerous. He lures you in with his charisma and his endearing personality. You believe he’s a trustworthy and kind old man, but there’s an insidious monster waiting for the right moment to strike underneath his welcoming persona. Just think about that sinister smile, as Cochran watched Buddy and his family suffer. He enjoyed every second of it, and you could say Cochran had a strong sense of pride knowing his masks actually worked.

Dan O’ Herlihy does a wonderful job of quickly switching gears as Cochran. The aftermath of the “misfire” scene and Marge Guttman’s (Garn Stephens) death sticks out. When Cochran arrives, he’s upbeat and reassuring about Marge’s condition. Of course, it’s all lies. Notice how Cochran’s demeanor changes, when he turns his back and wants to know what happened to Marge. You can hear the tone of his voice change. He’s angry, disappointed, and you can tell Conal Cochran is not the kind of man, who tolerates mistakes, loose ends, or any cracks in the foundation. 

The scene, where Cochran explains why he’s doing what he’s doing is another good one. Listen to the rumbly tone in O’ Herlihy’s voice. It’s sick, but he’s serious about completing his mission. Cochran is disgusted by the reality of Halloween being reduced to children begging for candy, because for Cochran, Halloween has a deeper meaning and a bigger purpose. 

Cochran is unstoppable! Or is he? Cochran is a calculating and cerebral villain. His greatest adversary? Dr. Dan Challis (Tom Atkins)! Cochran, a thinking man, was always one step ahead of Dan and Ellie (Stacey Nelkin). Cochran knew they were lying about being a married couple, and he knew Dan wouldn’t leave the factory without trying to save Ellie. That’s why there’s an android version of Ellie, conveniently waiting for Dan to rescue her. No locked doors, no security protocols, no android guards outside her door. It was almost too easy to rescue “Ellie,” and Dan took the bait. 

Cochran is smart, so what happened? His ego got the best of him. Showing Dan the demise of The Kupfer Family was a big mistake. Dan learned how to use the Silver Shamrock emblems against Cochran and his cronies, because he watched how everything unfolded step by step. 

Taking a few steps back, Cochran could’ve easily ordered the androids to kill Dan, when he snuck into the factory. Dan’s immediate execution would’ve saved Cochran a lot of trouble. Instead, Cochran was more concerned with gloating and celebrating. Ellie (the android version), his plan b or the ace up his sleeve, didn’t stop Dan from warning the networks about his plans.

Cochran realizes he’s been defeated, but something strange happens. Cochran looks up at Dan, smiles, and he gives Challis a final round of applause before his demise. Why? I’ve always believed Cochran was able to respect and admire Dan’s gritty and persistent efforts. Cochran never believed Dan could’ve pulled it off. He was bested by someone, who didn’t stand a chance. Dan, the unlikely and lucky hero, with a fighting spirit, and you could say Cochran graciously accepted his defeat, while acknowledging Dan’s victory. 

But let’s not forget about the final channel playing the dangerous Silver Shamrock jingle commercial. Did Dan really win in the end? Maybe it was a case of too little, too late? We don’t know if the network pulled the last commercial. There’s a chance that Cochran, the ultimate devious prankster, succeeded. You always want to believe everything worked out for the best. The big feel good happy ending, but you simply can’t underestimate Conal Cochran, whether he’s alive or dead. 

The Thing (2011)

**This review contains spoilers**

I will always love The Thing 1982. It is an excellent science fiction/horror film, and this film ranks high up my list of remakes, because it is one of the best damn remakes ever. I always enjoy this film, and I pop it into the DVD player a few times each month. The prequel/remake to John Carpenter’s 1982 classic was at the top of my must-see list of films for 2011. I was anxious to see the prequel, and I had some hope for it, but this was an enormous letdown for me.

The 1982 version of The Thing was fantastic. This film featured some very good tension, it was mysterious, and this film could be genuinely scary most of the time. Also, The Thing 1982 was repulsive, because the special affects in this film could always provide plenty of shocking and cringing moments. But the same thing can’t be said about the 2011 version.

Yeah, The Thing 2011 does feature some very impressive special effects, because the CGI does look great. But the CGI in this film didn’t provide any shocking and disgusting moments. In Carpenter’s 1982 version, the creature kills and absorptions brought that “HOLY SHIT THIS IS GROSS! I CAN’T BELIEVE WHAT I’M SEEING” type of reaction out me. But the creature kills and absorptions in this film brought that “Oh look. Cool CGI effects” reaction out of me. The effects in this film didn’t shock me, and they didn’t want to make me turn away from the screen. The visuals in this film are a pleasing treat for the eyes, but they don’t provide any shocking moments.

The Thing 1982 provided some great tension throughout the entire film, and this film did feature a chilling and eerie atmosphere. But this version of The Thing felt pretty dull and boring most of the time. There wasn’t any real tension here, there aren’t too many spook moments, and this film isn’t scary at all. They tried to give the audience some more action and suspense in this one, but the attempt at some extra thrills didn’t do anything for me. For the most part, the action in this film isn’t too thrilling, and the suspense doesn’t pick up until the very end.

I like Mary Elizabeth Winstead. She’s a solid young actress, who has some promise. Winstead did deliver a very solid performance in this film, and she wasn’t bad as the leading lady here, but she is no R.J. MacReady. Kurt Russell was a better leading character in Carpenter’s 1982 version. Russell’s acting was better, and his character was a lot stronger throughout the entire film. Kate Lloyd (Winstead) doesn’t show any signs of real strength until the final moments of this film. She slowly comes out of her shell, but Winstead’s character just comes off as this person, who nobody wants to believe, and she has to eat shit from her boss, Dr. Sander Halversen (Ulrich Thomsen). Winstead did deliver a very solid performance, but her character seems so weak most of the time. Also, the bulk of the cast was pretty bland here. Carpenter’s 1982 version featured a nice set of colorful characters, and the overall acting was a lot better. Lars was the only other character who stood out in this film. Jørgen Langhelle could be funny, and at times, he was believable as a bad ass. And Joel Edgerton (Sam Carter) actually delivered another solid performance, but his acting couldn’t help elevate this film. The majority of the 2011 cast was so dull, and I was actually waiting for some of them to die, because I didn’t care about their characters.

Also, the tests in this film didn’t make too much sense. In the 1982 version, blood tests were used to determine each character’s health. These tests would let everyone know, who was human and who was an alien. Blood test make a lot of sense, but in this film they use teeth tests??? The creature can’t copy inorganic materials, and Kate found some bloody teeth will fillings in a bathroom. The creature spit out the teeth, because it couldn’t absorb them, and it was trying to hide this important secret. Someone wasn’t human, so Kate came up with the idea of having teeth tests. Her idea was pretty simple: whoever had fillings was human, but anyone without fillings in their teeth was an instant suspect. Everyone had to endure the quick teeth checks, as Kate checked every mouth with a flashlight, and these tests did cause some finger pointing, and the trust issues began to unfold. Yeah, I thought this was pretty stupid. Everyone doesn’t have cavities, because some people actually do take good care of their teeth. The teeth tests really didn’t solve anything, because Kate still wasn’t sure who was 100% human. Blood tests were the only surefire way of determining the human characters, and the teeth tests were a waste of time. I know, I know, this is a new version of The Thing, and the story will have its differences, but the teeth tests were still silly.

Survival was another important theme in the 1982 version of The Thing. A deadly alien creature has taken over the research facility, and this alien wants to escape. The deaths are coming quickly, and they’re becoming more frequent and viscous as the story progresses. I can understand trying to contain the alien threat, but the safety measures in this film didn’t make any sense. Kate begins to panic, because she realizes how serious the situation is. She doesn’t want the alien to escape, because it might try to take over the world. So Kate has one bright idea: Disable the vehicles??? Umm, yeah, I know you don’t want to take the chance of the alien escaping, but I couldn‘t buy into these precautions. The creature could destroy the Earth, but shouldn’t you give yourself a chance to survive? You’re going to have to leave the research facility at some point, so how in the hell are you going to leave, if you disabled all of your means of transportation??? And you’re pretty much stranded at a remote location in Antarctica, a massive snow storm is approaching, so you can’t just start walking to find shelter. The “let’s destroy the vehicles, so it can’t escape!” stuff drove me nuts, and I couldn’t believe what I was seeing on-screen.

The ending of this film does provide a nice cliffhanger, because the final moments of this film do show us how the alien survives, and story wise, this ending does open the door for the 1982 version. But in the end, this little cliffhanger wasn’t enough, and it couldn’t save this film. Bottom line, John Carpenter’s 1982 version of The Thing is far superior in every way, and it makes the 2011 version look like a joke. Sorry, but the theme music wasn’t enough. Using the same theme music from the 1982 version was a nice touch, and it did provide some good nostalgia for fans of the older film, but this touch of nostalgia couldn’t improve anything here.

Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Joel Edgerton, and Jørgen Langhelle were the highlights of the acting department, because they did deliver some very solid performances, but the cast in the 1982 film was still better in every way. Carpenter’s 1982 version featured better acting, a better cast of characters, the tension was unbelievable, this film was genuinely scary and terrifying, and the special effects looked more realistic and disgusting.

The 2011 version does feature some cool effects, and the CGI is great. You can’t deny that, but in a way, the amazing and detailed CGI hurts this film. As I said before, the effects in the 1982 version created some genuinely disturbing moments, but the CGI in this film can be too mesmerizing at times. I was in awe of the special affects, but they didn’t make me cringe, and they didn’t disgust me. The Thing 2011 is a boring and lifeless big time Hollywood production with cool special effects. This wouldn’t have been good as a standalone film, and this wasn’t a good prequel/remake. The Thing 2011 is mediocre at best, and fans of the 1982 version should avoid this. Don’t let the “how it all it began” stuff lure you to this film, because you will be disappointed. Just watch the 1982 version. Don’t waste your time with the new film, because the experience isn’t worth it, and you will hate this.

Final Rating: 3/10